Executive summary
- The UK could achieve ‘clean power’ by 2030, but a rigid focus on this date may be counterproductive. A rushed transition risks infrastructure gaps, hindering future energy system development. That could increase environmental impacts, harm industrial competitiveness, raise energy bills, and erode public support.
- Acknowledging the challenges of the clean energy transition should not be used to justify inaction. Instead, this Primer advocates for a more realistic approach, prioritising a well-executed transition over an arbitrary 2030 deadline. Sir Keir Starmer, Prime Minister, recently clarified that the United Kingdom (UK) is targeting 95% clean energy by 2030, not 100%. This move should be welcomed as it provides valuable flexibility for a successful and sustainable energy future.
- The UK should continue to extend the lifespan of its large nuclear capacity, invest in small modular reactors, and carefully examine price formation.
About the author
Dr Mann Virdee is a Senior Research Fellow in Science, Technology, and Economics at the Council on Geostrategy. He leads Caudwell Strong Britain. Previously, he was a researcher at the RAND Corporation, where he managed and conducted research on areas such as artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, 5G, space science and governance, biotechnology and the life sciences, and research and innovation. Mann has also worked for the UK Parliament and the Parliamentary Network on the World Bank and IMF.
Disclaimer
This publication should not be considered in any way to constitute advice. It is for knowledge and educational purposes only. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council on Geostrategy or the views of its Advisory Council.
Image credit: Power line, power supply with countryside landscape, Frederick Doerschem, Canva Pro content license
No. 2025/01 | ISBN: 978-1-914441-92-9