Sustainment under strike and sabotage: Contested logistics in the Wider North

Executive summary

  • The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) can no longer assume a permissive environment for logistics operations across Europe. Failure to secure supply lines in the event of a conflict risks delays to reinforcement, heavy pre-battle attrition of critical assets, and a potential collapse in frontline combat effectiveness.
  • The contested logistics environment can be broken down into four challenges: geographic chokepoints; limited lift capacity; limited militarily useful infrastructure; and limited defences for supply lines.
  • Options for bolstering supply line resilience include better leveraging of commercial capacity and expertise, investing more in hardening primary logistics sites and routes and exploring redundancy, establishing dedicated logistics defences, and baking contested logistics assumptions into exercises.

About the authors

William Freer is Research Fellow in National Security at the Council on Geostrategy.


Charlotte Kleberg is Director at Wallenius Lines and an Adjunct Fellow at the Council on Geostrategy.

Disclaimer

This publication should not be considered in any way to constitute advice. It is for knowledge and educational purposes only. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Council on Geostrategy or the views of its Advisory Council.

Image credit: 5 Rifles depart for Estonia, UK Ministry of Defence © Crown copyright 2022

No. 2026/07 | ISBN: 978-1-917893-23-7